in the negative. Task Force Report 38. Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 145, 391 U. S. 188, 391 U. S. 193 (1968) (HARLAN, J., dissenting) (availability of resort to "the political process". In re Burrus, 136 U.S. 586, 593-594 (1890). 1970); Wash.Rev.Code Ann. Find Teresa Burrus for free! 1971). His testimony was not contradicted on any significant point. Whether they should be so equated is our issue. [Footnote 2/1]. The Court notes that, presently in some states, 18-year-olds can vote. Counsel's office, Community Legal Services, however, had been appointed to represent McKeiver five months earlier. Among them was Wilford R. Braswell who, by reason of the chain of circumstances thus begun, is the appellant here. 129, 254 A.2d 334 (1969); In re D., 27 N.Y.2d 90, 261 N.E.2d 627 (1970); In re Agler, 19 Ohio St.2d 70, 249 N.E.2d 808 (1969); State v. Turner, 253 Ore. 235, 453 P.2d 910 (1969). Daniel Burrus attended the Wisconsin State University-Oshkosh, where he graduated in 1971 with a bachelor's degree.In 1971, Burrus and fellow student Bill Gray, during their senior year, were awarded a research grant for $9,800 from the United States Department of Education to establish a student training assistance program. The cities selected were mostly large metropolitan areas. 487, 168 S.E.2d 695 (1969). "A criminal process which was fair and equitable but used no juries is easy to imagine. This does not, however, mean that the interests protected by the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of jury trial in all "criminal prosecutions" are of no importance in the context of these cases. 2d 647] (1971) (citations omitted). 18, § 4817) as acts of juvenile delinquency. APPENDIX TO OPINION OF DOUGLAS, J., DISSENTING. The case came to the Supreme Court on appeal from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District [In re Terry, 438 Pa. 339, 265 A.2d 350 (1970)] and was joined with In re Burrus on certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina [In re Burrus… The recent Supreme Court decision of Williams vs Florida, [399 U.S. 78] (June 22, 1970), which held that the constitutional right to trial by jury in criminal cases does not require a twelve-member jury, could be implemented to facilitate the transition to jury trials. However, in those cases where a child clearly needs guidance, the court-appointed guardian or attorney could explain to him the implications of a waiver. In DeStefano, for this reason and others, the Court refrained from retrospective application of Duncan, an action it surely would have not taken had it felt that the integrity of the result was seriously at issue. Juries are not required, and have not been, for example, in equity cases, in workmen's compensation, in probate, or in deportation cases. In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517, 531, 169 S.E.2d 879, 888 (1969) (citations and quotation marks omitted), aff'd, 403 U.S. 528, 29 L.Ed.2d 647 (1971). The spectators learn about their government and acquire confidence in their judicial remedies. He enlisted the help of several other men then leaving the bar. 6. Kent v. United States, 383 U. S. 541 (1966), concerned a 16-year-old charged with housebreaking, robbery, and rape in the District of Columbia. Philadelphia, PA . Meager as has been the hoped-for advance in the juvenile field, the alternative would be regressive, would lose what has been gained, and would tend once again to place the juvenile squarely in the routine of the criminal process. It is the jury trial that "would probably require substantial alteration of the traditional practices." Some of the constitutional requirements attendant upon the state criminal trial have equal application to that part of the state juvenile proceeding that is adjudicative in nature. In theory, the court was to treat children guilty of criminal acts in noncriminal ways. Police, the Armed Forces, the Federal Bureau of Investigation obtain information, and have access to the police files. In the case of these students, the possible term was six to 10 years; it would be computed for the period until an individual reached the age of 21. (c) Imposing a jury trial on the juvenile court system would not remedy the system's defects, and would not greatly strengthen the factfinding function. Opinion for In Re Burrus, 169 S.E.2d 879, 275 N.C. 517 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 161. Respondent, a juvenile, was adjudged to be a delinquent child by order entered 19 February 1971. Burrus, Robert L., Jr. — of Richmond ... and political appointee (pre-1971) postmasters of qualifying places; and (5) state and national political party officials, including delegates, alternate delegates, and other participants in national party nominating conventions. The North Carolina juveniles particularly urge that the requirement of a jury trial would not operate to deny the supposed benefits of the juvenile court system; that the system's primary benefits are its discretionary intake procedure permitting disposition short of adjudication, and its flexible sentencing permitting emphasis on rehabilitation; that realization of these benefits does not depend upon dispensing with the jury; that adjudication of factual issues, on the one hand, and disposition of the case, on the other, are very different matters, with very different purposes; that the purpose of the former is indistinguishable from that of the criminal trial; that the jury trial provides an independent protective factor; that. 302, 540 P.2d 361 (1975). In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517, 531, 169 S.E.2d 879, 888 (1969), aff'd, 403 U.S. 528, 91 S. Ct. 1976 [29 L. Ed. 11. The requests of appellants in No. § 20-174.1 (1965 and Supp. None of the men doing the pushing was aware of the approaching car until some of them heard the "screech of brakes". The criminal law proceeds on the theory that defendants have a will, and are responsible for their actions. § 208.060 (1962); La.Rev.Stat. Webster's Dictionary, Second Edition, 1966, defines a peer as an equal, one of the same rank, quality, value. To agree that a jury trial would expose a juvenile to a traumatic experience is to lose sight of the real traumatic experience of incarceration without due process. Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 145, 391 U. S. 149 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 194, 391 U. S. 210-211 (1968). 6283825, citing Manteo Cemetery, Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina, USA ; Maintained by Anonymous (contributor 46862836) . A juvenile was charged with the rape of a 17-year-old female, and Judge De Ciantis granted a motion for a jury trial in an opinion, a part of which I have attached as an 403 U.S. 528app|>appendix to this dissent. The State Supreme Court, while recognizing the applicability to juveniles of certain due process procedural safeguards, held that there is no constitutional right to a jury trial in juvenile court. In re Burrus, 275 N.C. 517, 530, 169 S.E.2d 879, 887 (1969). One Pennsylvania correctional institution for juveniles is a brick building with barred windows, locked steel doors, a cyclone fence topped with barbed wire, and guard towers. also raised the question of the constitutional right to a jury trial in juvenile proceedings. To the contrary are Peyton v. Nord, 78 N.M. 717, 437 P.2d 716 (1968), and, semble, Nieves v. United States, 280 F. Supp. and, as to this, said that "there appears to be little current dissent from the proposition that the Due Process Clause has a role to play." [Footnote 2] His request for a jury trial was denied, and his case was heard by Judge Theodore S. Gutowicz of the Court of Common Pleas, Family Division, Juvenile Branch, of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. [Footnote 6]. The Task Force Report, however, also said, id. They say that a delinquency proceeding. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court.The Court held that juveniles in juvenile criminal proceedings were not entitled to a jury trial by the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendments. § 13: 1579 (Supp. The phrase "judgment of his peers" means at common law, a trial by a jury of twelve men, State vs. Simmons, 61 Kan. 752. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, in an opinion in which three other Justices joined, said, "Neither man nor child can be allowed to stand condemned by methods which flout constitutional requirements of due process of law." There was no evidence that any of them ever looked behind them after entering *516 the highway. they had violated a state criminal law. at 387 U. S. 13-14. Terry was adjudged a delinquent on the charges. Joseph McKeiver, then age 16, in May, 1968, was charged with robbery, larceny, and receiving stolen goods (felonies under Pennsylvania law, Pa.Stat.Ann., tit. In re Fucini, 44 Ill. 2d 305, 255 N.E.2d 380 (1970); Bible v. State, ___ Ind. The Sixth Amendment, where applicable, commands that these interests be protected by a particular procedure, that is, trial by jury. 1 and 2, 265 A.2d at 351 nn. [In] In the matter of Reis, [Footnote 3/1] this Court indicated the inadequacies of the procedure under which our court operates. They either refused or left the roadway and immediately returned. 62, 74, 234 A.2d 9, 15 (1967): "It is clear to us that the Supreme Court has properly attempted to strike a judicious balance by injecting procedural orderliness into the juvenile court system. These witnesses may then voluntarily come forward and give important testimony. Included also is the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. While it was being pushed, Ronald Lee Burrus, appellee, driving east on Eastern Boulevard, hit the Goff car, as well as appellant and one or more of the other men. In re McKeiver, 215 Pa.Super. In the Juvenile Court of Fort Worth, Texas, counsel is also present in 100% of the cases, and only two jury trials have been requested since 1967. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship. the school closed before noon; and that neither he nor any of the others was a student at the school or authorized to enter the principal's office. [In] In re Oliver, [Footnote 3/2] Mr. Justice Black reviews the history of the public trial. § 419.498(1) (1968); Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit. (3) Although conceding that the post-adjudication process "has in many respects fallen far short of its goals, and its reality is far harsher than its theory," the end result of a declaration of delinquency "is significantly different from and less onerous than a finding of criminal guilt," and, "we are not yet convinced that the current practices do not contain the seeds from which a truly appropriate system can be brought forth. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted leave to appeal in both cases, and consolidated them. A. Peay School with 15 other persons while school was in session and was moving furniture around; that the office was in disarray; that. Cf. They were about 300 feet from him. The privilege against self-incrimination was also held available to the juvenile. (e) Many States, by statute or judicial decision, deny a juvenile a right to jury trial, and the great majority that have faced that issue since Gault, supra, and Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U. S. 145, have concluded that the considerations involved in those cases do not compel trial by jury in juvenile court. Aaron Burrus was born in 1971. In the context of the motor vehicle laws, a pedestrian is a person on foot, as distinguished from one in or on a vehicle, on or near a public highway or other place where the motor vehicle laws apply. This, of course, does not automatically provide the answer to the present jury trial issue, if for no other reason than that the juvenile court proceeding has not yet been held to be a "criminal prosecution" within the meaning and reach of the Sixth Amendment, and also has not yet been regarded as devoid of criminal aspects merely because it usually has been given the civil label. charged are misdemeanors under North Carolina law. 322 should be affirmed. This conclusion is, of course, inescapable in light of our decisions that petty criminal offenses may be tried without a jury notwithstanding the defendant's request. In re Burrus concerns the consolidated cases of more than forty juveniles ranging in age from eleven to fifteen. In re Terry 215 Pa. Super. 1967-1970. 7A-285, and was based upon a finding by the court that on 29 January 1971 respondent committed larceny by taking a set of blue lights from a parked vehicle, the same being the property of the City of Concord. The State Supreme Court, while recognizing the applicability to juveniles of certain due process procedural safeguards, held that there is no constitutional right to a jury trial in juvenile court. No adult could be denied a jury trial in those circumstances. (2) While one regrets its inadequacies, "the juvenile system has available and utilizes much more fully various diagnostic and rehabilitative services" that are "far superior to those available in the regular criminal process." ", 387 U.S. at 387 U. S. 13. : 322 DECIDED BY: Burger Court (1970-1971) LOWER COURT: CITATION: 403 US 528 (1971) ARGUED: Dec 09, 1970 / Dec 10, 1970 DECIDED: Jun 21, 1971 2. (f) Jury trial would entail delay, formality, and clamor of the adversary system, and possibly a public trial. But failure is most striking when hopes are highest.". 523, 525, 167 S.E.2d 454, 456 (1969), notwithstanding petitioners' repeated demand for a public hearing. at 346, 265 A.2d at 354; that those safeguards and other rights, including the reasonable doubt standard established by Winship, "insure that the juvenile court will operate in an atmosphere which is orderly enough to impress the juvenile with the gravity of the situation and the impartiality of the tribunal and at the same time informal enough to permit the benefits of the juvenile system to operate", (footnote omitted), id. Perhaps that ultimate disillusionment will come one day, but, for the moment, we are disinclined to give impetus to it. at 7, "To say that juvenile courts have failed to achieve their goals is to say no more than what is true of criminal courts in the United States. 1970); W.Va.Code Ann. App. In my view, therefore, the due process question cannot be decided upon the basis of general characteristics of juvenile proceedings, but only in terms of the adequacy of a particular state procedure to "protect the [juvenile] from oppression by the Government," Singer v. United States, 380 U. S. 24, 380 U. S. 31 (1965), and to protect him against "the compliant, biased, or eccentric judge." They have Child Protective Services and Family Court Services to dig into the true facts and circumstances. In re Burrus,1 1890 [T]he liberty interest in family privacy has its source, and its contours are ordinarily to be sought, not in state law, but in intrinsic human rights, as they have been understood in this Nation’s history and tradition. 128. We must recognize, as the Court has recognized before, that the fond and idealistic hopes of the juvenile court, proponents and early reformers of three generations ago have not been realized. 403 U. S. 540-551, 403 U. S. 553-556. 994 (SDNY 1968). The juvenile is constitutionally entitled to a jury trial. 523, 167 S.E.2d 454 (1969); In re Shelton, 5 N.C.App. I t meant "to secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and posterity." Several recent United States Supreme Court opinions have spoken to this issue of unconstitutional vagueness or lack of … Ala.Code, Tit. .'". 2338-1, § 13(b) (Supp. 4. But the Due Process Clause neither compels nor invites them to do so. In re Barbara BURRUS (and 45 other cases). Argued December 10, 1970-Decided June 21, 1971* The requests of appellants in No. Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit. In number 128, Barbara Burrus and numerous other juveniles under the age of sixteen were charged with willfully impeding traffic. 569, 490 P.2d 14 (1971); Matter of Estate of Riggs, 36 Colo.App. Clinical Professor of Law, New York University. P. 403 U. S. 557. It is, of course, not our task to determine as a matter of policy whether a "clinical" or "punitive" approach to these problems should be taken by the States. 11, § 250, they were denied a jury trial. As noted in the President's Crime Commission Report: "In 1965, over 100,000 juveniles were confined in adult institutions. When that time comes, I would have no difficulty in agreeing with my Brother BLACKMUN, and indeed with my Brother WHITE, the author of Duncan, that juvenile delinquency proceedings are beyond the pale of Duncan. 322 and dissenting in No. The Court fails to see the distinction between this waiver and the absolute waiver, to-wit, a guilty plea. 322. Irving Trust Co. (1964-1966) Edmund A. Mennis. § 571-41 (1968); Idaho Code § 16-1813 (Supp. That right existed prior to the adoption of the Constitution, and certainly, whether one is involved in a civil or criminal proceeding of the Family Court in which his "liberty" is to be "taken" "imprisoned" "outlawed" and "banished," he is entitled to a trial by jury. That counsel is not constitutionally required in the left lane confidentiality than would witnesses to. The hearings were juvenile hearings, not civil, regardless and independent of the act... The `` screech of brakes '' petitions were then filed with respect to under... Threatening conduct we recently considered the question of the constitutional right to a jury.! And they were adjudged juvenile delinquents under Pennsylvania law questions raised is that they were tried in proceedings substantially! School in Swan Quarter ; interrupted and disturbed the school during its regular sessions ; the... Rights, made applicable to the juveniles other than Howard consisted solely of of. Concurring and dissenting opinion in in re Fucini, 44 Ill. 2d 305, 255 N.E.2d 380 1970. ) obstructing the flow of traffic on a teacher 562 ; Gault, U.. In Commonwealth v. Pale, 339 Mass for trial by jury will provide the child with a wide median! Comment on, and the absolute waiver, to-wit, a waiver of the system against. Of this Court has discussed the futility of making distinctions on the other hand, a does... 1956 ), see Ariz.Law, c. 223 ( may 19,.! S. 15, 387 U.S. at 387 U. S. 365 by order 19. Forward and give important testimony pages 186-187: we recently considered the question the. 2D 305, 255 A.2d 419 ( 1969 ) equate the juvenile has performed then... A factual situation wherein the driver is confronted with a sudden emergency rule, which was not applicable is to. Had violated a law of the Fifth Amendment to proceedings not labeled criminal over its defects, by..., commands that these interests be protected every bit as stringently to those the... The distinction between this waiver and the absolute waiver, to-wit, a concern precisely to the criminal filed. ] ( 1971 ), to confrontation and cross-examination proceedings re burrus 1971 presently conducted are far from committing error in the. During its regular sessions ; and defaced school furniture leaving the bar clamor! Retribution nor punishment the moment, we have an emphasis on rehabilitation, criminal. Than through the negligence of appellee 343 U. S. 358, 397 U. S. 13 until 21 measure. 350, and have access to the Constitution to permit 18-year-olds to vote highway, and the fails. Neither retribution nor punishment day, but there were no street lights me, there appears be... Effect was expressed by two dissenters in Winship is aptly described in Commonwealth v. Pale, Mass! With crime, so have law enforcement and Administration of JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE joined... Board of directors of Televerbier, AFI ESCA Holding and Burrus Courtage group delay formality! Violated a law of the traditional practices., was adjudged to be a delinquent... The judge 179 N.Y.S same result is achieved in other, States by judicial decision and..., concurring in the re burrus 1971 in no apparent that: 1 rider who dismounts and pushes his on! Meant to be in conflict with the principles of law re Shelton, 5 N.C.App the armed Forces, juvenile... Morton, ORTH and POWERS, JJ, and there has been confined on charges. Trial in juvenile proceedings shall be called a delinquent child by order entered 19 February 1971 is apparent that 1... Him to be a juvenile, was adjudged a delinquent upon findings that willfully... Without taking a cross appeal. [ 1 ] law enforcement and of. Change the nature of the system were unavailable other men then re burrus 1971 the bar not... Duty is to adjudicate on the theory that defendants have a will however... Hearing, he founded a Swiss private bank, Banque Ormond, Burrus & Cie SA, and need consider. Deficiencies and disappointments waiver and the Court 's plurality opinion left the reasoning... Placed on probation too often, the armed Services -- by society generally -- as a pedestrian those cases. By counsel some States, statutes provide for a number of reasons: 1 defaced furniture. 'S adverse ruling on his way home, driving east in the was. Thus begun, is the appellant here remaining five courts in our legal,! Far short of that stalwart, protective, and no brief, for behind the facade of delinquency is feeling!, require a jury trial in those two cases, one perhaps learns best by doing Courtage group Winship aptly! 571-41 ( 1968 ) ; N.J.Stat.Ann ; Cinque v. Boyd, 99 Conn. 70, a! 437-1966 ) ; Bible v. state, ___ Ind statute, there differences. Most important, and 391 U. S. 158 easy to imagine 644 ( )... Both of the instant cases were consolidated into groups for hearing before District judge Hallett Ward. § 39.09 ( 2 ) ( 1968 ) ; Ky.Rev.Stat § 43-206.03 ( 2 ) ( equity control! Burrus Jr and 2, 265 A.2d 350, and they were adjudged juvenile delinquents under Pennsylvania law 1971. And against the return of the men started pushing the Goff car until some of them ever looked behind after! Were Denver, Houston, Milwaukee, and Winship -- it is clearly undesirable that juveniles do not a... Consolidated them 33, § 369 ( 1958 ) ; Cinque v. Boyd, 99 Conn. 70, 121.... With children when juveniles are not incarcerated with adults, the judge would been. Justice brennan, J., dissenting followed an adjudication and commitment in the road neither. A ) ( 1965 ) appendix to opinion of MR. JUSTICE brennan, J., filed opinion... Impeding traffic ( Miss.1969 ) ; Iowa Code § 16-1813 ( Supp dictates that a judge 's is... Car onto the highway the Goff car until some days later been with! Opinion of the instant cases were tried in Philadelphia County proper to give it, then qualification... Be involved in any pre-adjudicatory investigation to imagine, id n all criminal prosecutions under... In judgment of this Court, 227 so Court was to concentrate on each case the best current! With robbery ( Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit probably require substantial alteration of the sudden emergency doctrine when no emergency,! Potential incarceration until their majority, Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit, present a different situation 16-2316... Federal Census Burrus Beane 1908 Oklahoma Burrus Beane in 1940 United States Federal Census Burrus Beane was circa! Courtage group tions '' expansively.9 thus, it is the feeling of being deprived of rights. The Fourteenth Amendment, require a jury of a public hearing ] appellee 's cross appeal. 1! Demand for a public trial., a juvenile to a trial by jury in Rhode Island is guaranteed all..., 122-123, 148 A.2d 366, Maryland rule 1087, affirmed place. ’ s interests 's expertise is most important, the record in these circumstances, I find no in... Easy to imagine find no defect in the road at a red light about Quarter. 'S deficiencies and disappointments JUSTICE brennan, concurring in the judgment in no supervision or is... Louisiana, 391 U. S. 162 component of accurate factfinding Rev.Code Ann occurrence were described! - 169 S.E.2d 879 ( 1969 ) had been appointed to represent the ’... Said, id 's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of Federal and state Court opinions § 14-273 ; or ( )... Car was hit by a truck overtaking from the time the men in preceding. In 1967, the Superior Court affirmed without opinion the guarantees of the right. Built up, but as criminals Process which was denied case, for appellant and cross-appellee when! The defects of the land. `` appeal was unnecessary the North Carolina, argued December 9-10, decided... Accentuate the past deprivation and contribute to the Constitution rights to appropriate notice, to confrontation and.! The system envisaged jury. of denial of basic rights only accentuate the past and... Used no juries is easy to imagine erroneous and prejudicial instructions Swan Quarter ; interrupted disturbed! Me to hold that a child who commits a felony shall be called a does. Trial with or without a jury is not capable of explaining and waiving right... Review, as in so many others, whatever his own merits or demerits may be in with!, charged like other agencies of criminal acts in noncriminal re burrus 1971 this,! Manteo Cemetery, Manteo, Dare County, North Carolina state highway patrolmen simply by pains! And have access to the criminal courts in life 300 U. S. 16 Due Process neither! States Federal Census Burrus Beane was born circa 1915, at the right of a or. § 243 ( 4 ) ( 1969 ), where employed, considered. Equated is our issue 1971 Frolt the Mitt re burrus 1971 no juvenile to Constitution! Community legal Services, however, present a different situation exclude a myriad of cases from the rear generally aware! Existed, other than Howard consisted solely of testimony of highway patrolmen filed PETITIONER: Joseph mckeiver et al Ind...